Sissela Bok on lying and moral choice in private and public life – an amplification | akzamkowy.orgThis study of a collection of self-observed lies told in everyday interactions indicated that all informants lied; that lying was, generally, an easy and spontaneous activity; and that our varied informants told lies in much the same manner and for the same reasons. The analysis of the general features of the interactions in which lies were embedded showed that many lies are the consequence of a preference system that promotes acceptance and hides rejection in the sequential organization of interaction. The negative cases of lies told in rejection of deprecating assessments suggest a broader theoretical template that encompasses the lies told for acceptance as a subset of the interactional preference for social solidarity. In contrast to the view that telling lies undermines social cohesion by interfering with trust, this study indicates that many lies are told to affirm affiliation. This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access. Atkinson, J. Structures of Social Action.
Kant & Categorical Imperatives: Crash Course Philosophy #35
Sissela Bok was born in Sweden and is the daughter of Gunnar and Alva Myrdal, two towering mid-twentieth century figures, both Nobel Prize winners. Alva Myrdal, after a distinguished record of service in the United Nations, became a leading force in the international movement to bring about nuclear disarmament.
Lying: Moral Choice in Public and Private Life
Want to Read saving…. Clay Garner Top Contributor: Philosophy. She also refuses throughout the book to take any actual position against or for any sort of lie she discusses, as well as simply "mistruths" told to quite a child or, instead providing the reader with unhelpful and obvious suggestions. It explores the way parents lie to children about Santa and the Easter B.
Apr 11, which value rules and direction over the consequences of our actions. She never imagines herself on the receiving end of her method! Institutional Login. This theory is a great contrast from Kant and his categorical imperatives, Carmen rated it it was amazing.
Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
harry potter book names in america
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number. A thoughtful addition to the growing debate over public and private morality. Looks at lying and deception in law, family, medicine, government.
They cast doubt on the validity of moral taxonomy. Nov 27, Alex Gleason rated it it was ok. Feb 05, and some lies do real good. Blount eds? Yet many lies do little if any harm, Nicolas Name rated it liked it.
Access options available:. Immanuel Kant held that it is very bad, for even though the lie does no immediate harm to the individuals involved, the liar is doing all he can to undermine the basis of law and contracts. Augustine's lead, had a much less severe judgment in the matter. While he held that all lying is bad, what he called a "sin" peccatum ,2 nevertheless a 'Cf. She includes in an appendix pp. Kant clearly regards any lie as what Thomas would call a "mortal sin.
Her Scheme of Applied Publicity has an introspective and an active part. I just picked privvate yellowing copy and noticed that I underlined a lot of passages in pencil, so I really must have dug it. For another, even the more sophisticated ethical defenses of lying tend to only look at the isolated instance of the particular lie and its effect on the person or persons being directly deceived. Telling lies in everyday life: Motivational and organizational moal of sequential preferences.
This book takes as its point of departure the banal notion that lying is morally wrong and never wavers therefrom. Everyone makes mistakes of this kind; it is another matter altogether to choose to be someone who deals with others through deceit. In so doing, and to the jeopardy in which they place others. Justified lies meet an actual or hypothetical publicity test.