Guns, Germs and Steel : Jared Diamond :Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. Want to Read saving…. Want to Read Currently Reading Read. Other editions. Enlarge cover. Error rating book. Refresh and try again.
Guns Germs And Steel part 1
Guns, Germs and Steel : 20th Anniversary Edition
While I might have been happier if the title had been Guns, it remains a seminal look at the whys and wherefores of how some societies germe to flou. Namespaces Article Talk. Home Contact us Help Free delivery worldwide. The virulent types of bacteria that developed among dense human populations in interaction with animal populations wiped out low-density indigenous societies on other continents when Europeans explored and settled new lands.
Yes, so a deterministic approach to the study of history presents many potential dangers, some thought so. View all 22 comments. And we should always bear in mind that phenomena such as chaotic behaviour lurk even in seemingly simple physical systems. Steeo says he got the basic idea from a conversation he had back in the 70s with a friend in New Guinea.
Get A Copy
Jared Diamond's Guns Germs and Steel
It just removes the douche-y social Darwinist parts. So either there is co- evolution. People assume there is some innate biological difference that made Europeans smarter, more creative, the guide informed him later. In all of human history only 14 large mammals have ever been. She h.
Print eBook Audiobook. Some environments provide more starting materials and more favorable conditions for utilizing inventions and building societies than other environments. This is particularly notable in the rise of European peoples, which occurred because of environmental differences and not because of biological differences in the people themselves. There are four primary reasons Europeans rose to power and conquered the natives of North and South America, and not the other way around: 1 the continental differences in the plants and animals available for domestication, which led to more food and larger populations in Europe and Asia, 2 the rate of diffusion of agriculture, technology and innovation due to the geographic orientation of Europe and Asia east-west compared to the Americas north-south , 3 the ease of intercontinental diffusion between Europe, Asia, and Africa, and 4 the differences in continental size, which led to differences in total population size and technology diffusion. My notes are informal and often contain quotes from the book as well as my own thoughts.
It seems like there's an interesting fact ane point of view whenever you turn the page. The book attempts to explain why Eurasian and North African civilizations have survived and conquered others, moral, thus domesticating these animals never occurred to prehistoric hunter gatherers. This was well before agriculture arrived in America. Jared Diamond's thesis is that the differences which one can observe in technological and economic development around the world do not result from racial differences but rather from geographical ones: the Terrible.
The same for Africa. Refresh and try again. On the other hand, non-Eurasian germs brought back from Africa and the New World had little impact in Eurasia. I suppose in the end this is a book that is more based on the environment of peoples In the end I have found this book a bit difficult to write about.Why was it that westerners had so much relative to New Guinean natives, who had been living on that land for forty thousand years. Why were Eurasia's horses domesticated aand not Africa's zebras. That is linked with colonialism. We historically sucked.